Skip to main content



If you can accept that chairs can have varying functionality and be made of different material yet still all be valid chairs you can do the same for trans women and trans men. #transgender

A consideration already made for cis people of course, it's just inconsistently applied when trans people are involved


Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


Is there a #FOSS self-hosted version of discord?

What about something similar to twitch that does streaming?

One of the reasons twitch is popular is because it's easy to have your audience help support the cost of running your channel. So, systems for micropayment are also an area for possible future expansion.

Or are there technical hurdles or cost hurdles to building such things?
#OSS

#foss #oss
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to myrmepropagandist

Some of our hackerspaces use Matrix, so we use Matrix spaces like a "Discord" replacement - but I can't really recommend it, because Matrix is "the opposite of user-friendly".
This entry was edited (15 hours ago)
in reply to myrmepropagandist

there are several OSS discord-likes, the one I use is Matrix/Element. The dev team for "Tusky" makes heavy use of self hosted Matrix. Everyone I know who runs Matrix servers complains about the product quality tho.

The open source Twitch alike I'm currently trying out is stream.place . I've done one successful stream there already. The one thing I don't like is it is partially built on top of Bluesky which creates awkwardness.


Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


Our president just fired head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because the most recent jobs numbers didn't match his feelings about how good the economy is. He did not explain WHY he thought the report was incorrect. Naturally many people now say we won't be able to trust future reports.

To me, faking such numbers seems difficult.

Dr. Reich, @rbreich as a former Secretary of Labor and guy who knows about The Economy can you tells us what might be tell-tale signs of a "Fake Jobs Report" ?

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to myrmepropagandist

"Faking the numbers" is only going to be difficult if one cares about _convincingly_ faking them.

But bullies and fascists don't work like that. Faking them badly, baldly, obviously is better for them, because it shows their contempt and their power. "We're screwing this up and there's nothing you can do about it. We control the baseline assumptions of your world; tremble before us or be ruined."

TFG has been consistent in one sense: Everything he's doing 1) Makes the US weaker and less likely to be a military, cultural, or commercial force in the world of the future, and 2) makes him feel like king, even if, in the end, he's king of an ash heap.

Really, his behavior becomes a lot more explicable if you can accept that he hates America, because he views America as a rival for the attention and adulation he craves for himself.

This entry was edited (5 days ago)

Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


The last time there is a whole lot of controversy around the dude "Pirate Software" aka Thor aka Jason

For years he presented himself like some sort of god in software / game development because he "worked at Blizzard" for years

He worked on a game for over 7 years now and on release it turned out to be a walking / talking simulator that was incredibly bad written in code

The reason he worked at Blizzard for years is because his daddy is an exec there and no one dared to fire him



Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


Pete Buttigieg and Gavin Newsom know they're lying about trans kids.

If they'll lie about literal children and watch the wolves feast, what will they do to you?

in reply to PallasRiot

I'm mad because they get NOTHING for this horse trading. The voter who is like "oh I was going to vote for a democrat but if only they just hated trans people just a little (but not too much) then I would be OK with it" is not a real person.

So, even if you want to be cynical and say "we must make sacrifices" all they are doing is sacrificing me and my trans friends and STILL not even winning.

"You know at least the Democrats aren't bigots" was all that was left.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird I've thought Buttigieg had some good moments, and then he'd go out of his way to show how he highly values bipartisanship.

He's just fundamentally not on our side.

in reply to FoolishOwl

I kind of question the political instincts, desire to survive and ability to learn from recent history of *any* Democrat who is still trying to do bipartisanship.

Listen.

They are just not that into you, OK?

I could bring up lucy and the football but that meme about Democrats is older than some kids who can vote now.

And bipartisanship has been blown up with no hope of repair.

This entry was edited (6 days ago)

reshared this

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@foolishowl
Have we forgotten that two Democrats in Minnesota were targeted for assassination and one died with her husband just a few weeks ago?

And none of the Republicans had anything kind or "bipartisan" to say in that moment. Some even made jokes.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @foolishowl Frankly at this point anything "bipartisan" is almost certainly so deeply corrupt that it only benefits the paymasters of both parties. Bipartisanship is never a virtue, it's at most a strategy and certainly the wrong one for the moment.

n8chz ๐ŸฉŽ reshared this.

in reply to PallasRiot

@foolishowl

IDK. When people like MTG or Hawley stumble through their vague populist impulses towards possibly good bills such as banning congress from trading stocks it makes sense to help them in the most narrow possible way to pass those bills I think.

Very important: You don't need to be nice to them as you do this.

Is that bipartisan? Or just a broken clock colliding with good legislative ideas?

(Public support for banning stock trading is huge and we should do it.)

myrmepropagandist reshared this.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

The problem, of course, is that any of those almost never make it through as a narrowly scoped single issue bill. They get other awful things attached to it, so then any Dems have to weigh: do we vote for this pile of awful with one good thing and let the primaries attack ads write themselves, or do I just vote against it and hope the Rs don't strip it out at the end anyway.
@futurebird @PallasRiot @foolishowl
in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @foolishowl I'd advocate that legislators could only invest in a single algorithm-managed mutual fund, including every publicly-traded company domestic to their jurisdiction, that does not allow trades while the legislature is in session. For all recesses, all buys have to take place during the half before the next session starts, and all sells during the half after the last session ended. Want number go up? Pass laws good for your state or nation.

myrmepropagandist reshared this.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

Neolibs have been continually trying to make the Bill Clinton "triangulation" strategy work for 30 years now. And it never really works. The only way they still manage to win occasionally is when the Republicans have been especially awful recently or they have an incumbent advantage so they can laze around, change nothing, and wait for the pendulum to swing back. And it kinda sorta worked in the era of the neocons. But now that Rs have swung extreme right populist, the "middle ground" they want to try and triangulate on simply doesn't exist, because that's simply going to be fash-lite. And if someone is willing to vote fash anyway, they'll just vote ACTUAL fascists.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangโ€ฆ

@futurebird @foolishowl @PallasRiot

This entry was edited (3 days ago)

myrmepropagandist reshared this.

in reply to Jess๐Ÿ‘พ

@JessTheUnstill @foolishowl
This is one of a few words that I have a very deep negative reaction to hearing. I feel like it's ruined everything.
in reply to myrmepropagandist

The Democrats have never understood why they win. When Bill and Obama won it was thru vibes, mostly, but they never manage to recreate them.

Instead they constantly (as shown above) move the "middle" to the right to stay "in the status quo" to catch the theoretical "undecided conservative" that has never existed.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Jess๐Ÿ‘พ

@JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl I think we need trianglulation more like this. And it works because Democratic leaders are deliberately obtuse anyway.
in reply to Jess๐Ÿ‘พ

@JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl This is about 20 years out of date. The Democratic party since the Iraq war has consistently tried to do major left policies like Biden's original Build Back Better act, a statutory right to abortion, blocks on gerrymandering, or a public option in Obama's ACA, and been blocked by Democrats in Name only like Lieberman, Manchin, and Sinema. Manchin and Sinema eventually even dropped the pretense and switched to independent.
in reply to CurtAdams

@CurtAdams @JessTheUnstill @foolishowl
I agree that those are motions in the right direction, furtive ones. However then you have:

"Listen, I do not agree with Zoran on many issues, and I think we have some important conversations to have about the future of this city, but the voters have spoken and I am proud to endorse him for mayor as our Democratic nominee"

- The Thing I Did Not Hear From Cuomo and Others After The Primary.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @JessTheUnstill @foolishowl Cuomo is another DINO. He spent his whole time in office trying to prevent the Democrats from controlling the NY statehouse. And, like the other DINOs, he's just thrown over his (fake) Democratic affiliation to run as an independent.
in reply to CurtAdams

@CurtAdams

If you think ACA and Build Back Better were "major left policies" I have some shocking and disturbing news for you.

@JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl @PallasRiot

in reply to John

@johnzajac @JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl Can you name a bill, anywhere, in any country, that did more to stop climate change than Build Back Better?

Do you think 20 million people getting insurance, and *everybody* insured actually getting to use their insurance when they get sick, is small? And, of course, Obama wanted even bigger, with a public option and bigger subsidies. But DINOs, especially Lieberman, stopped that.

in reply to CurtAdams

@CurtAdams

Friend, I'm telling you that neither of those bills was leftist, or sufficient.

You're saying "well, they made our extraordinarily brutal and evil system slightly less brutal and evil", and that's true-ish.

Like most Democratic "compromises", they gave away the long term for very minor and transient short term wins. I can't name a bill that did more, because the US is notorious for not doing *anything*. So kudos, I guess?

@JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl @PallasRiot

in reply to John

@johnzajac @JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl Can you answer the question? When, any wherre, any time, was any bill passed that did more to fight climate change than Build Back Better?

The answer is "never". It was the largest by far. If you're saying the biggest policy ever to address IMO the biggest issue in the world is too little to justify support, then your standards are unreasonable.

in reply to CurtAdams

I think this question is changing the subject. John's point is Democrats have not done enough, did not use their time in power to good effect. You have highlighted some of the things that they did do which were very difficult.

But what if part of what makes it difficult is that it's not enough?

Frankly I get mixed messages from Democrats. Voters when polled think they are as corrupt as Republicans.

Why is that?

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @johnzajac @JessTheUnstill @foolishowl The public thinks the Democrats are equally corrupt because the media spent VASTLY more time talking about Hillary Clinton using email the same way every previous Secretary of State did than they did talking about the hundreds of millions in fraud Trump did - including fraudulent charity operations *during the 2016 campaign* bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-3โ€ฆ
in reply to CurtAdams

@CurtAdams @johnzajac @JessTheUnstill @foolishowl
People who don't care about right-wing fake scandals also think they are corrupt. I'm talking about people who always vote for democrats and don't care about the emails.

This isn't about media.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @johnzajac @JessTheUnstill @foolishowl Except is *is* about media. I know a number of Democrats who falsely thought Hillary had done something significantly wrong, even though they couldn't name it (because she didn't), and the reason was the relentless drumbeat of criticism in the media.
in reply to myrmepropagandist

@CurtAdams @johnzajac

This isn't, in my view, a problem of messaging or of voters "not knowing all the good things Biden did" I did my best to push that too! No. They would just say "but what about Pelosi trading stocks?" or "why is our foreign policy like that?" or "but what will they *do* about immigration?"

Last one is interesting because it *wasn't* that they wanted harsh enforcement. Just a real change from this quasi-legal black market labor nonsense.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @johnzajac We *did* have an immigration bill. Trump blocked it.

The important point is that when the policies aren't good enough, the problem is almost always that the Democrats don't have a large enough majority.

in reply to CurtAdams

@CurtAdams @johnzajac

An immigration bill but also so much backing for more border security. Which is like admitting that the border was ever really a problem. If the thesis is that immigrants don't cause crime (because they don't) why do they keep doing things that suggest republicans are correct?

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @johnzajac Well, because the Democrats had to have some Republican support to pass the bill.

When Dems are really in control, like here in CA, we get sanctuary policies and healthcare for undocumented immigrants.

in reply to CurtAdams

@CurtAdams @johnzajac

Do you think that if Democrats keep doing what they have been doing they will win?

Frankly, as a very practical matter, that's my top concern. How do they wrestle back enough power to move us away from this cliff? And further, if they do get power will they be able to use it effectively?

I have been trusting the democratic leadership "knows what they are doing" and I think that's a big mistake now.

For example: They could stop trading stocks. They could do that today.

myrmepropagandist reshared this.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@CurtAdams @johnzajac

They keep saying "democracy is in danger" and I believe them.

Yet some of their actions don't tell that same story.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@CurtAdams @johnzajac

In this post I make a suggestion for one thing they might be able to do right now:

sauropods.win/@futurebird/1149โ€ฆ


This is a "contract with America" style idea. The Republican party used the contract with America when they were a minority party to re-energize their base and define who they were (eg. horrible, but some people like that?)

The thing about a Contract or Party Pledge is you get EVERY (or almost every) member to pledge to do something significant that people care about:

* No more stock trading
* Contribution Limits eg. end to special interests

1/


in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @johnzajac I very much like a "Contract with America" proposal, and no Congressional/Presidential stock trading belongs at the top of the list.

Except - they've already proposed such a bill!

in reply to CurtAdams

@CurtAdams @johnzajac

I know. But why not just do it without the bill now?

Then ask why the Republicans won't?

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird

At some point, this question has to evolve into a statement about intent. And when it does, we need to be ready to chuck the DNC into the Potomac and replace them.

I respect people who aren't there yet, but the clock's ticking on a host of issues, and the timelines we're working with are natural, merciless, and not political. We don't have another generation to ease the Dems out of their torpor and send the "party elders" off to the Undying Lands in a boat.

@CurtAdams

in reply to Tim Richards

It is very hard to get much done as a minority party and they have a few actions-- but, nothing that helps to define who they are other than "not Trump" (don't get me wrong for some of us that's enough, but not everyone)

I have a possible suggestion since I don't think they will unite behind any left wing ideas, not all of the democrats.

But one thing they could all do is clean up the roots of corruption that no voters like.

sauropods.win/@futurebird/1149โ€ฆ


This is a "contract with America" style idea. The Republican party used the contract with America when they were a minority party to re-energize their base and define who they were (eg. horrible, but some people like that?)

The thing about a Contract or Party Pledge is you get EVERY (or almost every) member to pledge to do something significant that people care about:

* No more stock trading
* Contribution Limits eg. end to special interests

1/


This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @timrichards @CurtAdams @johnzajac
I am deeply afraid that they share those roots. Why not stop trading stocks? Because ... insider trading makes them rich and that's important.
in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird

It seems like when Democrats are the minority party, "it's very hard to get much done as a minority party", but when Republicans are the minority party *they literally set the agenda, define the conversation, and hound Democrats until they walk into the sea*.

I don't think this is a "minority party" problem; it's a *Democratic* party problem.

@timrichards @CurtAdams

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @johnzajac

I don't think there's much the Democrats can do, because the problem is mostly that the Republican have taken control of the media and constantly push anti-Dem messages. They flood social media with people saying the Democrats are "useless" and "not enough".

The actions of the billionaires prove that's not true. If the Dems really were useless, Musk wouldn't have spent 40 billion dollars to make Twitter into a right-wing propaganda machine,

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @CurtAdams @johnzajac

Top Dems and top GOP are the same these days: itโ€™s all about the money, now more than ever.

What the GOP understands better is the money depends on image and clicks, not values or facts.

That is the environment, like it or not.

Things will not change before some calamity or the Dems catch upโ€”and manage to do that without sliding into their own form of extremism.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @CurtAdams

I think this is a distraction because political leadership is about so much more than legislation, which is something Republicans have understood since Reagan and something Democrats haven't understood since JFK and RFK were assassinated.

The real missed play here isn't "immigration legislation"; it's calling out GOP lies about the impact immigration has on the country. It's acknowledging and celebrating our reliance on migrant workers. It's supporting their unions.

in reply to John

@futurebird @CurtAdams

On every one of those cultural ideals Democrats failed to make the case on moral OR statistical grounds, despite having the better hand.

I don't think it's because they hate immigrants; I think it's because they've convinced themselves that neoliberal economic policies are *worth widespread unrest* and *some ethnic groups...not making it*. Because they're ideologues.

That's not a hit; it's an observation of their commitment to policies that don't work.

in reply to John

@johnzajac @CurtAdams

"It's supporting their unions."

The union angle is the perfect one IMO. Because people who have had their wages depressed by immigrant labor are just people we pretend don't exist. Republicans also don't talk about this exactly, they just do racism.

If the line were "everyone should be able to unionize. no one should have to compete against off the books labor" I think it'd make a real difference with the kind of voters who have drifted away from democrats.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird @CurtAdams

I agree with this.

IMO, the real issue then is one of credibility: Biden breaking the railroad strike harmed the Democrats far more than they acknowledge. That New Palestine happened weeks later, and they spent weeks trying to bury the story (despite the *black mushroom cloud* lol) just highlighted how wrong Biden was.

Democrats need consistency, and they need to enforce loyalty in the party ranks. WE know they can do that, because they *routinely* do it on the left.

in reply to John

@johnzajac @futurebird @CurtAdams Around here, Biden breaking the railroad strike shredded confidence in the Dems amongst workers in the trades.
in reply to sidereal

@sidereal @johnzajac @CurtAdams

You know what makes it worse? In the long run he did come around. Like I do think this issue was blown up more than it should have been. And he tried hard to course correct. But his initial issues were way off.

Way off.

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird

Let's be fair: you can't "course correct" a betrayal. It's a betrayal. He didn't just mess up; he did something politically suicidal during a time of extraordinary requirements on our political leaders.

He was the wrong person for the job, foisted on us by a scared and ideological DNC leadership, including Obama.

And yet, none of them have taken responsibility; they'd rather whistle past the graveyard than try to regain people's trust.

@sidereal @CurtAdams

in reply to John

@futurebird @CurtAdams

It's kind of our earlier discussion: a scheme to eliminate big donors doesn't work if you fudge it just a *leeeetle* bit for these specific big donors.

A loud support of unions doesn't matter if it comes and goes depending on what the consultants say.

EDIT: I think Democrats are addicted to default votes and have literally forgotten how to get affirmative ones. That's why absent a completely re-do of their leadership, I struggle to see the party doing any of this.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to John

@johnzajac @CurtAdams

"Are you a real one?"

If this is a battle against the corrupt it's important to ... not be corrupt. And I don't mean "corrupt" as in breaking laws, I mean not being beholden to special interests of big business or foreign governments.

There is this idea that if the Republicans are "just as bad" on an issue we can ignore it. I think that's a mistake.

Yes, they should win because they are "better" but nobody believes them anymore and that is a problem.

in reply to John

@CurtAdams

I have literally written essays on why the ACA was, in the end, a net negative for healthcare in the country, but this will have to do for this forum:

1) The ACA made assumptions about good faith on the part of the insurance companies that have proven to be naive
2) The resultant regulatory framework looks like it was written by industry consultants, and probably was
3) So today, millions "have" health insurance, but...

@JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl @PallasRiot

in reply to John

@johnzajac @JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl Just the ACA Medicaid expansion alone saved 19,000 lives over 3 years. cbpp.org/research/health/medicโ€ฆ. And would have saved 15,000 more if the Republicans on the Supreme court hadn't rewritten then law.

It's now been 11 years since implementation, and I think a law that was written to save about 100,000 is a very good thing. Do you disagree?

in reply to CurtAdams

@CurtAdams @johnzajac

I don't know if many people here are even suggesting that we wouldn't be "better off" with democrats now and in general?

My concern is that I am terrified that their lack of vision will mean that they do not win.

I don't think trying to tell people they are amazing worked well at all. Because they are not amazing. They are simply "much better than Republicans, technically" that is a hard sell.

in reply to John

@CurtAdams

..claim denials have skyrocketed, to the point where "having" for-profit health insurance just keeps you from actual healthcare. Special categories of deductible have proliferated so that literally everything has the max allowable under the law, and unlike pre-ACA, getting one procedure or device *doesn't lower any of the other deductibles*. Co-pays and Rx tables swarm people's bank accounts and deny them the medication they need

@JessTheUnstill @futurebird @foolishowl @PallasRiot

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird
๐Ÿ’ฏ ๐Ÿ’ฏ ๐Ÿ’ฏ

The right has their base indoctrinated that anyone as far left as Reagan might as well be Satan himself. There is no middle ground to seek to appeal to those voters.

The way to win is to appeal to the colossal base of Americans that want lower housing costs, lower medical costs, and higher minimum wage.

But almost all Democrats at the national level would quite literally rather lose than fight for any of those things. Sanders, AOC, Ilhan Omar - outliers.

Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden, John Fetterman, Cory Booker would all rather see Trump in office than AOC. That's where we are.

in reply to PallasRiot

I don't expect much from cishet men like Newsom, but Buttigieg really showing his Rohmian credentials

but honestly my expectations with gays who work for corporations that bust unions and help corporations fix bread prices are about as low as with cishet men, so, I'm not really surprised. He was probably one of those "yes well marriage is preferable but civil unions..."

none of these fuckers know what liberation means, or if they do they hate it



"Gender Critical" nurse EXPOSED over racist comments

https:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ks0tNKkB80

#SandiePeggie #Transphobia #racism #terfs #LGBTQ #transgender #trans #bigotry #youtube


Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


Hard to believe the noise that comes out of this one's mouth. A cross between fingernails down a blackboard and a broken foghorn. Quite horrendous. Happy annoying but cute #caturday


in reply to Ars Technica

too bad we don't have a USAID anymore to get this medicine out to people who could really use it.
in reply to Ars Technica

Lo genial serรญa prohibir a EEUU hacer experimentos extraรฑos...

Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


do The Youths these days still know about Pokemon Crystal Vietnamese? So called because it was discovered in a market in Vietnam, it's a romhack translation from Japanese to English (presumably before the real English version released), except it seems to have been made entirely on the basis of a Japanese-to-Chinese dictionary and then a Chinese-to-English dictionary. For example, what's semantically quite close to "insert"...?

(my own screenshots from 2013)

#pokemon #romhack #localization #translation







Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


This morning I gave someone an introductory talk on how HTTP works, by demonstrating a few simple HTTP transactions by hand using "openssl s_connect" (gone are the days when you can do that using nc), explaining what all the bits and pieces are, and then showing how to look up what Firefox is doing in the developer tools to see full-sized examples.

Right at the end of the talk, I thought "hang on, this seems like exactly the kind of 'learn a thing from basics' material that @b0rk likes to write about, I wonder if she has a blog post covering the same ground?"

Better still, she has a whole zine! jvns.ca/blog/2019/09/12/new-ziโ€ฆ Moral: perhaps I should think of that _first_ next time.




in reply to zombiewarrior

@zombiewarrior It's on the website front page, but we don't present the project every time we make a maintenance update ๐Ÿ˜‰
Thank you anyways for the feedback, we'll add a very short presentation in the posts, the next time.
in reply to Solarus

also, just to be clear, i was glad i learned about the engine because i might use it in a project soon
:)


in reply to Transgender World

Bigots never stop at hating one other. If they loudly spew transphobia you can bet they hold other hateful views



Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


With Microsoft Office integrating AI into itself ANNNND charging subscription fees, I'm finding myself using LibreOffice for almost everything now.

LibreOffice is free. Period.

But! Nothing saying you can't take that MS subscription fee and do an annual recurring donation to LibreOffice ๐Ÿ˜…

Good way to increase LibreOffice's already great functionality.

libreoffice.org/donate/

Edit to Include: They're on Mastodon! @libreoffice

#FOSS #solarPunk

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Tinker โ˜€๏ธ

What's the current state of LibreOffice vs OpenOffice? I seem to remember a kerfluffle around pull requests and bug fixes, but that was years ago.
in reply to Dexter

@wheeljack OpenOffice's last big update was in 2014. The last minor update was in 2023, and it now has years-old, unfixed security problems: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Oโ€ฆ โ€“ For some reason, Apache still calls it the "leading open source office suite" despite the vulnerabilities and zero significant updates for a decade. We don't know why, but it is so bad for the image of open source.

Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


"Why does it say the hospital is equipped for stroke emergency? We were there. They denied!"

"Maybe you should contact them that their website is wrong. This is dangerous."

"It wasn't on their website..."
*starts googling a specific question*
"Weird now it says no instead of yes."

I go to take a look and realise with horror, yes: Google AI summary.

Google AI summary made my parents-in-law visit the wrong, unequipped hospital for a potential stroke emergency. ๐Ÿ™ƒ

in reply to Krautdragon [ Art ]

If you have a stroke, you call an ambulance, which brings you to a suitable hospital. You don't start a web search and get in your own car. I don't think that changed with "AI" summaries.
This entry was edited (6 days ago)




Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


My partner got me a set of gouache paints for my birthday. I decided to break them in with a sketch of a scene I saw at our suet feeder yesterday: a grackle staring down a blue jay over taking too long at his turn.

#art #MastoArt #watercolor #gouache #birds


Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


We all need some good news. And this is very good news.

newatlas.com/infectious-diseasโ€ฆ


Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


#Fedilab 3.34.0 has been published.

Release notes:

codeberg.org/tom79/Fedilab/relโ€ฆ

in reply to Fedilab Apps

Hello,

I translated all the strings into Catalan but I got the version's message all in English anyway.

So was I too late or is there something wrong?

in reply to jpujolar

@jpujolar
Did you try in settings > languages > reset languages? Maybe you have to restart the app. It should use your system language.
in reply to Fedilab Apps

@jpujolar
I checked commits, your translations were merged after we published 3.34.0. So they will be available in the next release. Thank you for your contributions.
in reply to Fedilab Apps

>Quote support for Mastodon

How.does that work ?

>Fix text selection stop working when composing

Nice, that has been super annoyimg for some.

Great App !



Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


I tried playing with using Dijkstra maps for enemy pathfinding in my small #SNES game. Turns out that with a small map like this one they're easily viable on SNES and aren't too expensive; you can spread the calculations over multiple frames and spend a variable amount of CPU time on it per frame if you want.

This does mean movement that's very clearly grid-based, but you can do stuff to make it less prominent. I have the enemies here slowly center themselves on the axis perpendicular to the one they're moving in, which helps a little bit.

Some enemies probably will use this pathfinding style all the time, though for others I think it'll be something that will kick in when an enemy is having trouble finding the player using atan2 or other methods.

#gamedev #snesdev #homebrew


in reply to George Takei ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ––๐Ÿฝ

This sentence was quite hard to parse: "This is the criminal Trumpโ€™s DOJ granted limited immunity to"

My brain was unable to put "criminal" and "Trump" in two separate noun clauses...



Darth Tiktaalik ๐Ÿณ๏ธ‍โšง๏ธ reshared this.


It looks like we are under attack, that caused SSH connections to fail. We have deployed mitigations and the situation calmed down. Please let us know if the issue occurs again.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Codeberg.org

is it a coincidence, that every time Trump visits Europe there are attacks on Codeberg? Last February the same thing happened during the "Security council" in Munich. I initially considered coincidence last February attacks but the same thing happening again is more of a pattern than a random incident.
in reply to black scooter geek

@thodix There might be a correlation, but unlikely to be any connection behind conspiracy theories ๐Ÿ˜‰
in reply to Codeberg.org

in any case, Thank You @Codeberg for your quality service, your hard work and the hope you beacon for a free software infrastructure.




Slightly more robust post debunking #transphobic talking points for the sticky, somewhat longer by necessity

Study Ordered by Utah Republicans Finds Gender-Affirming Care Benefits Trans Youth

them.us/story/utah-gender-affiโ€ฆ

"Rate of regret after Gender-affirming surgery is approximately 1%. Other life decisions, such as having children and getting a tattoo have regret rates of 7% and 16.2%, respectively."

americanjournalofsurgery.com/aโ€ฆ


Trans women and fairness in sports


Transgender Athletes Could Be At A Physical Disadvantage, Research Shows

forbes.com/sites/lindseyedarviโ€ฆ

Specific claims of unfairness are self debunking if the source is at all honest about the situation.

For example trans marathon runner Glenique Frank finished 6,159th in the female category but you would get an entirely different impression if you didn't read past the headlines in the daily mail: archive.ph/udkN7

Similarly, Riley Gaines's fairness grievance was literally a tie for fifth place.

Nobody's placement changes if Lia Thomas didn't compete and again, the complaint was that a trans women dared to perform equally to a cis women athlete.

Then there's the chess controversy which is so ridiculous and misogynist that I don't need to dignify it with a debunking. It's just sexism dressed up as concern for cis women.

Miscellaneous

Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims

doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-025โ€ฆ


Further citations to research on the subject of transgender healthcare thanks to this archived reddit comment by tgjer web.archive.org/web/2019082319โ€ฆ

#transgender #transRights #TransAthletes #LGBTQ #GenderAffirmingCare #GenderAffirmingSurgery #trans #TransWomen

โ‡ง