I think Gödel's incompleteness theorem and undecidable problems show something about reality, or perhaps mathematics, rather than the human mind.
I don't see what this has to do with the human mind, though. I would say the human mind can definitely be modelled as a computer of some sort, it is a computer, but not one that resembles a commercially available computer. They have significant differences, but I think theoretically one could write a program that would mimic the way the human mind works. It would have to use AI techniques like neural networks, and be able to rewrite itself in limited ways, which we haven't figured out how they work. But I don't think it would be impossible.
AgreeableLandscape
in reply to tomasz • • •don't like this
agarorn and جيا ميڠ don't like this.
Liwott
in reply to AgreeableLandscape • •like this
AgreeableLandscape, Dochyo and CannotSleep420 like this.
جيا ميڠ doesn't like this.
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
in reply to tomasz • • •like this
Sr Estegosaurio, AgreeableLandscape, Dochyo and CannotSleep420 like this.
don't like this
Atahualpa and tomasz don't like this.
Christian
in reply to tomasz • • •like this
erpicht, sexy_peach, ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆, Reverse, agarorn, جيا ميڠ, Liwott, pinknoise and CannotSleep420 like this.
Reverse
in reply to tomasz • • •I don't see what this has to do with the human mind, though. I would say the human mind can definitely be modelled as a computer of some sort, it is a computer, but not one that resembles a commercially available computer. They have significant differences, but I think theoretically one could write a program that would mimic the way the human mind works. It would have to use AI techniques like neural networks, and be able to rewrite itself in limited ways, which we haven't figured out how they work. But I don't think it would be impossible.
like this
agarorn and skele_tron like this.
جيا ميڠ
in reply to tomasz • • •